Monday
May 29, 2017
Friday, May 12, 2017

Trump’s firing of Comey lengthens shadow hanging over presidency

Protesters gather to rally against US President Donald Trump’s firing of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey, outside the White House.
By Karen Tumulty
The Washington Post

US president’s shock decision to sack FBI director sparks concern

Once again, Donald Trump has tried to lift Moscow’s shadow off his presidency — and once again, he has done the opposite.

New questions are arising in the wake of his sudden decision to can FBI Director James Comey, along with revived calls for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the question of Russian influence in last year’s election and the Kremlin’s connections to Trump’s presidential campaign.

“The only thing that is guaranteed right now is that the sense of chaos will continue, not only in law enforcement but also in Congress,” said GOP strategist Kevin Madden, a veteran of Capitol Hill and the US Justice Department. “Every single lawmaker in the House and Senate is going to be pressured to take a stance.”

Of course, the surest way to end the controversy would be through a credible investigation that comes to a definite conclusion about the methods and extent of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and whether it involved improper dealings with people close to Trump.

“There will be no normalcy to his presidency if there is no independent investigation,” said Ron Klain, who was chief-of-staff in the US Justice Department during the Clinton administration. “There is something absolutely essential about it but nothing inevitable about it.”

When Trump fired an FBI director who was investigating his presidential campaign, “I was shocked last night, and I thought I couldn’t be shocked by anything anymore,” Madden said Wednesday. “Absent some sense of finality, members of Congress and law enforcement will have this hanging over them.”

But every out-of-the-ordinary turn seems to weaken confidence that the existing inquiries — both within the US Justice Department and by the two intelligence committees on Capitol Hill — will actually be capable of producing a result widely accepted as untainted and convincing. White House officials maintain that Comey’s firing had nothing to do with his agency’s Russia investigation but, rather, with his handling of the probe into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Yet Trump’s letter terminating Comey alluded to the questions surrounding his own administration (“While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation”) and made no mention of the FBI director’s much-criticised decisions involving Clinton.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders declined to say when and under what circumstances Comey gave assurances to the president that he was not under investigation. Nor were the day-after optics conducive to tamping down the controversy. The only event on Trump’s publicly announced schedule was a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. The session was closed to the media — with the apparent exception of a photographer from Russia’s state-run news agency, which lit up the Internet with its photos.

Then came another surreal turn: when reporters were summoned to the Oval Office for a brief opportunity to ask Trump questions, they found the president sitting not with Lavrov but with another visitor, former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger.

The inopportune presence of a Watergate-era figure punctuated comparisons of Trumps actions with president Richard M. Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre” of the special prosecutor looking into the scandal that ultimately forced Nixon’s resignation.

Reviving controversy

For Republicans, the frustration and perplexity surrounding Trump’s decision to fire Comey are compounded by the fact that it comes just days after his biggest legislative victory so far: the House passage last week of legislation to begin making good on the GOP’s promise to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Reviving the Russia controversy is likely to distract not only from the Senate’s efforts to pass its own healthcare legislation but also from other ambitious items on the GOP agenda, including overhauling the tax code.

“Comprehensive tax reform just got an awful lot harder, as did nearly every other challenge facing the nation, both foreign and domestic: infrastructure, healthcare, immigration, trade and others,” former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg wrote in a column.

In that sense, the timing is reminiscent of another episode earlier in the Trump presidency.

Four days after giving a widely praised address to Congress on February 28, the president tweeted a false claim that ex-president Barack Obama had tapped Trump’s phones “during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!”

That, too, was a reference to the investigation into links between Trump associates and the Russian government, and it exasperated Republicans who had been hopeful that the speech to Congress marked a new, more presidential turn on Trump’s part.

The debate over whether there is a need for a special prosecutor reflects doubts that the Justice Department is capable of doing its work in this highly charged political environment. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who wrote the memo recommending Comey’s dismissal, is highly respected by both parties on Capitol Hill, though some now say he cannot continue to oversee the probe, given his role in removing the lead investigator.

“Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein now has no choice but to appoint a special counsel,” Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, a senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “His integrity, and the integrity of the entire Justice Department, are at stake.”

Others disagree.

“I look at Rod J. Rosenstein, and I think who better than Rod J. Rosenstein to conduct an investigation,” said Mark Corallo, who directed public affairs at the US Justice Department during the George W. Bush administration. “There are enough people at the department who can do a credible investigation. The politics of this are going to be the usual Sturm und Drang of Washington.”

 

@ktumulty

  • Increase font size Decrease font sizeSize
  • Email article
    email
  • Print
    Print
  • Share
    1. Vote
    2. Not interesting Little interesting Interesting Very interesting Indispensable






  • Increase font size Decrease font size
  • mail
  • Print




    ámbito financiero    ambito.com    Docsalud    AlRugby.com    

Edition No. 5046 - This publication is a property of NEFIR S.A. -RNPI Nº 5293935 - Issn 1852 - 9224 - Te. 4349-1500 - San Juan 141 , (C1063ACY) CABA
Grupo Indalo